A prescritibilidade de ações de ressarcimento no erário no âmibito dos crimes federais frente ao acordo de não persecução penal e o princípio da duração razoável do processo

Abstract

The theme of this work is: The prescriptibility of actions for reimbursement to the public treasury in the context of federal crimes in light of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement and the principle of reasonable duration of the process. It investigates the following questions: What are the elements that make up the non-criminal prosecution agreement? What are the different types of prescription in criminal proceedings? What is the concept and characteristics of actions to reimburse the public treasury? What is the role of the principle of reasonable duration of the process in the procedural scenario? The following hypotheses were considered: Could the agreement contribute to the reduction of actions that expire without resolution, as well as to reduce the number of processes that last for years without great results? The general objective is to discover the effectiveness of the agreement against the limitation of actions. The objective of this work is, therefore, to discuss, question and reflect on the institution of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement, considering jurisprudence and current doctrine, to affirm or refute whether the role of the ANPP in the rapid resolution of conflicts has occurred in a satisfactory manner., based on critical and objective observations through the bibliographic collection used.