Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://repositorio.pucgoias.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/10577| Tipo: | Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso |
| Título: | Controle de constitucionalidade e seus aspectos estruturais no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro |
| Autor(es): | Oliveira, Clara Costa de |
| Primeiro Orientador: | Roriz, Míriam Moema de Castro e Silva Machado Mascarenhas |
| metadata.dc.contributor.referee1: | Gonzaga, Fausto Mendanha |
| Resumo: | O presente artigo analisa o controle de constitucionalidade no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, destacando seus fundamentos teóricos, conceitos e naturezas. O estudo examina a supremacia e a rigidez constitucional como premissas essenciais para a manutenção do Estado Democrático de Direito e da harmonia do sistema normativo. Utilizou-se o método dedutivo por meio de revisão doutrinária e normativa para descrever as modalidades de fiscalização vigentes no país. Investigaram-se as particularidades do controle difuso, marcado pela universalidade e acessoriedade no juízo monocrático, bem como a observância da cláusula de reserva de plenário nos tribunais. Adicionalmente, abordou-se o controle concentrado, detalhando o funcionamento da Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade e da Ação Declaratória de Constitucionalidade perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal. Os resultados indicam que o sistema brasileiro, ao adotar um modelo misto, confere ao Poder Judiciário o papel de fiscal da Constituição, garantindo que as normas incompatíveis não tenham eficácia e a segurança jurídica. Conclui-se que o aprimoramento das técnicas de decisão, como a interpretação conforme a Constituição e a modulação de efeitos, é fundamental para preservar o status quo da Constituição. Palavras-chave: Controle de Constitucionalidade; Supremacia Constitucional; Supremo Tribunal Federal; Direito Constitucional; Segurança Jurídica ABSTRACT This article analyzes the constitutionality control within the Brazilian legal system, highlighting its theoretical foundations, concepts, and nature. The study examines constitutional supremacy and rigidity as essential premises for maintaining the Democratic Rule of Law and the harmony of the normative system. A deductive method was used through a doctrinal and normative review to describe the types of judicial review active in the country. The particularities of diffuse control were investigated, characterized by universality and accessoriness in monocratic courts, as well as compliance with the full bench reservation clause in superior courts. Additionally, concentrated control was addressed, detailing the functioning of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) and the Declaratory Action of Constitutionality (ADC) before the Supreme Federal Court. The results indicate that the Brazilian system, by adopting a hybrid model, grants the Judiciary the role of indispensable guardian of the Constitution, ensuring the removal of incompatible norms and legal certainty. It is concluded that the improvement of decision-making techniques, such as interpretation in accordance with the Constitution and the modulation of effects, is fundamental to preserving institutional stability and fundamental rights. Keywords: Constitutionality Control; Constitutional Supremacy; Supreme Federal Court; Constitutional Law; Legal Certainty |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT This article analyzes the constitutionality control within the Brazilian legal system, highlighting its theoretical foundations, concepts, and nature. The study examines constitutional supremacy and rigidity as essential premises for maintaining the Democratic Rule of Law and the harmony of the normative system. A deductive method was used through a doctrinal and normative review to describe the types of judicial review active in the country. The particularities of diffuse control were investigated, characterized by universality and accessoriness in monocratic courts, as well as compliance with the full bench reservation clause in superior courts. Additionally, concentrated control was addressed, detailing the functioning of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) and the Declaratory Action of Constitutionality (ADC) before the Supreme Federal Court. The results indicate that the Brazilian system, by adopting a hybrid model, grants the Judiciary the role of indispensable guardian of the Constitution, ensuring the removal of incompatible norms and legal certainty. It is concluded that the improvement of decision-making techniques, such as interpretation in accordance with the Constitution and the modulation of effects, is fundamental to preserving institutional stability and fundamental rights. Keywords: Constitutionality Control; Constitutional Supremacy; Supreme Federal Court; Constitutional Law; Legal Certainty |
| Palavras-chave: | Palavras-chave: Controle de Constitucionalidade; Supremacia Constitucional; Supremo Tribunal Federal; Direito Constitucional; Segurança Jurídica ABSTRACT This article analyzes the constitutionality control within the Brazilian legal system, highlighting its theoretical foundations, concepts, and nature. The study examines constitutional supremacy and rigidity as essential premises for maintaining the Democratic Rule of Law and the harmony of the normative system. A deductive method was used through a doctrinal and normative review to describe the types of judicial review active in the country. The particularities of diffuse control were investigated, characterized by universality and accessoriness in monocratic courts, as well as compliance with the full bench reservation clause in superior courts. Additionally, concentrated control was addressed, detailing the functioning of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) and the Declaratory Action of Constitutionality (ADC) before the Supreme Federal Court. The results indicate that the Brazilian system, by adopting a hybrid model, grants the Judiciary the role of indispensable guardian of the Constitution, ensuring the removal of incompatible norms and legal certainty. It is concluded that the improvement of decision-making techniques, such as interpretation in accordance with the Constitution and the modulation of effects, is fundamental to preserving institutional stability and fundamental rights. Keywords: Constitutionality Control; Constitutional Supremacy; Supreme Federal Court; Constitutional Law; Legal Certainty |
| CNPq: | CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS |
| Idioma: | por |
| País: | Brasil |
| Editor: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás |
| Sigla da Instituição: | PUC Goiás |
| metadata.dc.publisher.department: | Escola de Direito, Negócios e Comunicação |
| Tipo de Acesso: | Acesso Aberto |
| URI: | https://repositorio.pucgoias.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/10577 |
| Data do documento: | 15-Mai-2026 |
| Aparece nas coleções: | TCC Direito |
Arquivos associados a este item:
| Arquivo | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCC modificado .docx | 164,7 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizar/Abrir |
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.
Ferramentas do administrador
