ANÁLISE DO PROTOCOLO ÍNDICE DE DESVANTAGEM PARA O CANTO MODERNO EM CANTORES POPULARES - REVISÃO NARRATIVA

Abstract

Introduction: It is important to highlight that voice professionals, especially singers, may or may not present structural alterations in the larynx, but often use the physiological voice mechanisms inadequately. Thus, vocal self-assessment protocols are part of the multidimensional evaluation of the voice and are developed with different approaches, influencing the individual perception being assessed. Objective: To identify and compare the most affected domain in vocal handicap indexes among popular singers. Method: This is a narrative review, selecting articles that analyzed the domains addressed in the Modern Singing Handicap Index (IDCM) questionnaire. Inclusion criteria were: original studies, in Portuguese, involving popular singers of both sexes, aged 18 to 80 years, that evaluated the domains related to vocal handicap. Exclusion criteria included: reviews, opinion papers, studies with classical or operatic singers, choirs, and articles in English or Spanish. Results: The initial search retrieved 36 articles from the LILACS, Scielo, and Capes Journals databases, from which 7 were selected. The studies showed that the “Defect” subscale had the highest scores in most samples, indicating a predominantly organic vocal impact. Conclusion: The review showed that the IDCM Protocol is an effective tool, with the “Defect” subscale being predominant. Variables such as gender, vocal experience, vocal habits, age group, income, and professional support significantly influence the results. Further studies are needed to deepen the understanding of factors affecting the vocal health of popular singers.