Os impactos da mídia nos julgamentos do Tribunal do Júri

Abstract

The present work, deals with the influence of the media our judgments of the Jury Court. To understand here that the middle point can interfere with the results of the judgment of a Jury Court, whether it is condemnatory or absolute, we must understand in the light of the Law, or that the Legislature can show us. This work was based on research and studies on the subject in question. I intend to expose here, that in some more emblematic cases, the media deals with a certain relevance, raising or knowing two facts to the four corners of the world. With mass propagation, two cases in which there is a lot of advertising, people can individually, make their own judgment, where the Jury can suffer the same personal opinion, in the case of the Sentencing Council, guess which judgment will be given to society. Information obtained through the media at times before the trial, there is a high probability that the outcome will satisfy the trial society and not the Law itself. Media coverage allows society to follow court proceedings, promoting transparency, giving visibility to important cases, helping to press for justice in neglected situations. The media can incentivize more ethical behavior from all parties involved, as such behavior is subject to public scrutiny. Sensationalistic coverage can sway jurors and judges, hindering a fair trial. I will address cases in which the media had substantial interference with the course of the proceedings or the outcome of the Jury Court.