PRODUÇÃO ACADÊMICA Repositório Acadêmico da Graduação (RAG) TCC Medicina
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.pucgoias.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1875
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorAlbernaz, Andréa Araújo dos Santos-
dc.creatorAlves, Deyse Maria Rodrigues-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T23:51:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-21T23:51:55Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.pucgoias.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1875-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify chromosomal abnormalities associated with miscarriage in the first trimester of pregnancy through a systematic review of studies published worldwide. Methodology: This is a systematic review of the literature, of publications around the world, about the chromosomal abnormalities that are causes of miscarriage, in the first trimester of pregnancy, in the last 20 years. Results: This study included 17 articles, with a total sample of 10,951 abortion products analyzed. Of these, 5,083 (46.5%) had normal karyotype and, in 5,868 products of conception, chromosomal anomalies were identified, representing 53.5%. Aneuploidies were the most frequent alterations and there was a predominance of trisomies, which accounted for 62.1% of chromosome disorders, followed by polyploidies (12.7%) and X chromosome monosomy (12.2%). Other changes were also identified, but less frequently. Regarding maternal age, about 61.6% of the changes occurred in mothers aged 35 years or over. Conclusion: Chromosomal anomalies have an important impact on pregnancy losses. Therefore, the analysis of the product of conception is of fundamental importance to clarify the cause of abortion.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipNão recebi financiamentopt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherPontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiáspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAneuploidiaspt_BR
dc.subjectAneuploidiaspt_BR
dc.subjectAberrações cromossômicaspt_BR
dc.subjectChromosome aberrationspt_BR
dc.subjectAborto espontâneopt_BR
dc.subjectSpontaneous abortionpt_BR
dc.subjectPrimeiro trimestre da gravidezpt_BR
dc.subjectPregnancy trimester firstpt_BR
dc.subjectCitogenéticapt_BR
dc.subjectCytogeneticspt_BR
dc.titleAlterações cromossômicas como causa de aborto espontâneo no primeiro trimestre de gestação: revisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.title.alternativeChromosomal alterations as a cause of miscarriage in the first trimester of pregnancy: systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeTrabalho de Conclusão de Cursopt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Silva, Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0645-3599pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4256300529988960pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Ataídes, Fábio Silvestre-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4614-5785pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9523959031041843pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Oliveira, Marcus Vinícius Paiva de-
dc.contributor.referee2IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4355-0064pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1672599081652980pt_BR
dc.description.resumoObjetivo: Identificar as anormalidades cromossômicas associadas ao abortamento espontâneo, no primeiro trimestre de gestação, por meio de revisão sistemática de estudos publicados em todo o mundo. Metodologia: Trata-se de revisão sistemática da literatura, de publicações em todo o mundo, acerca das anormalidades cromossômicas que são causas de aborto espontâneo, no primeiro trimestre de gestação, dos últimos 20 anos. Resultados: Fizeram parte deste estudo, 17 artigos, com amostra total de 10.951 produtos de abortos analisados. Destes, 5.083 (46,5%) tiveram cariótipo normal e, em 5.868 produtos de concepção, foram identificadas anomalias cromossômicas, representando 53,5%. As aneuploidias foram as alterações mais frequentes e houve predominância de trissomias, que representaram 62,1% das cromossomopatias, seguidas pelas poliploidias (12,7%) e monossomia do cromossomo X (12,2%). Outras alterações também foram identificadas, porém em menor frequência. Em relação à idade materna, cerca de 61,6% das alterações ocorreram em mães com idade superior ou igual a 35 anos. Conclusão: As anomalias cromossômicas têm importante impacto nas perdas gestacionais. Portanto, a análise do produto de concepção é de fundamental importância para o esclarecimento da causa do aborto.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEscola de Ciências Médicas, Farmacêuticas e Biomédicaspt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsPUC Goiáspt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINApt_BR
dc.relation.references1 Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006 Aug 12; 368(9535):601-11; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0 2 Warren JE, Silver, R M. Genetics of pregnancy loss. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology.2008;51(1):84–95; https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318161719c 3 Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: The genesis of human aneuploidy. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2001; 2(4):280–291; https://doi.org/10.1038/35066065 4 Ljunger E, Cnattingius S, Lundin C, Annerén G. Chromosomal anomalies in first-trimester miscarriages. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2005; 84(11): 1103–1107; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00882.x 5 Stephenson MD. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17(2): 446–451; https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.2.446 6 Moron AF, Camano L, Kulay Jr L. Obstetrícia. 1ª ed. Barueri: Editora Manole; 2011. 7 Silva AE, Migliori I, Jorge Y, Santos J. Casais com abortamento espontâneo recorrente: participação das translocações cromossômicas. Arq. Ciênc. Saúde. 2007; 14(4): 211–215. 8 Moraes A C, Moron A F, Hashimoto EM, Silva IDCG, Torloni M R, Souza MM, Patrício FR. Abordagem citogenética e molecular em material de abortos espontâneos. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2005; 27(9): 554–560; https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72032005000900009 9 Sanseverino MTV, Dorfman LE. Alterações citogenéticos na infertilidade e nos abortamentos de repetição. In: Maluf SW, Riegel M. Citogenética Humana. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011. pp. 286-293. 10 Lebedev I. Mosaic aneuploidy in early fetal losses. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2011; 133(2–4): 169–183; https://doi.org/10.1159/000324120 11 Levy B, Sigurjonsson S, Pettersen B, Maisenbacher MK, Hall MP, Demko Z, Lathi RB, Tao R, Aggarwal V, Rabinowitz M. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: Single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 124:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000325 12 Teixeira ACZ, Oliveira ARCP, Pereira TM, Jesus AN, Rodrigues MG, Salvador R, Agostinho MADB, Rodini ESO. Estudo citogenético de abortos espontâneos. Cytogenetical study on miscarriages. Arquivos de Ciência Da Saúde. 2009; 16(2): 59–61. 13 Nussbaum RL, Mcinnes RR, Willard HF. Thompson & Thompson: Genética médica. 7 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2008. 14 Rolnik DL, Carvalho MHB, Catelani ALPM, Pinto APAR, Lira JBG, Kusagari NK, Belline P, Chauffaille ML. Análise cicitogenéticica em material de abortamento espontâneo. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira. 2010; 56(6):681–683; https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302010000600017 15 Yakut S, Toru HS, Çetin Z, Özel D, Şimşek M, Mendilcioğlu İ, Lüleci G. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 457 spontaneous abortions and their histopathological findings. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2015; 31(2):111-8; https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2015.01303 PMID: 25944391. 16 Jia CW, Wang L, Lan YL, Song R, Zhou LY, Yu L, Yang Y, Liang Y, Li Y, Ma YM. Aneuploidy in Early Miscarriage and its Related Factors. Chinese Medical Journal. 2015; 128(20):2772-2776. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.167352 17 Liu S, Song L, Cram DS, Xiong L, Wang K, Wu R, Liu J, Deng K, Jia B, Zhong M, Yang F. Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46(4):472-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14849 PMID: 25767059. 18 Russo R, Sessa AM, Fumo R, Gaeta S. Chromosomal anomalies in early spontaneous abortions: interphase FISH analysis on 855 FFPE first trimester abortions. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36(2):186-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4768 19 Coelho FF, Marques FK, Gonçalves MS, Almeida VC, Mateo EC, Ferreira AC. Detecção de aneuploidias em abortos espontâneos por PCR quantitativo fluorescente com marcadores curtos de repetição em tandem: um estudo retrospectivo. Genet Mol Res. 2016; 15(3). https://doi.org/10.4238 / gmr.15038617 PMID: 27706771. 20 Ozawa N, Sago H, Matsuoka K, Maruyama T, Migita O, Aizu Y, Inazawa J. Cytogenetic analysis of spontaneously discharged products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Springerplus. 2016 Jun 24; 5(1):874. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2594-6 PMID: 27386323; PMCID: PMC4920787. 21 Shen J, Wu W, Gao C, Ochin H, Qu D, Xie J, Gao L, Zhou Y, Cui Y, Liu J. Chromosomal copy number analysis on chorionic villus samples from early spontaneous miscarriages by high throughput genetic technology. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2016; 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0210-z 22 Soler A, Morales C, Mademont-Soler I, Margarit E, Borrell A, Borobio V, Muñoz M, Sánchez A. Overview of Chromosome Abnormalities in First Trimester Miscarriages: a series of 1,011 consecutive chorionic villi sample karyotypes. Cytogenetic And Genome Research. 2017; 152(2):81-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000477707 23 SULAIMAN KM. Chromosomal study for Assessment of Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) technique in Erbil City Iraqi- Kurdistan Region. Iraqi Journal of Cancer and Medical Genetics. 2018; 10(2). 24 TELES TMA, PAULA CMM, Ramos MG, Costa HBLM, ANDRADE CRA, COXIR SA, PENNA MLF. Freqüência de anormalidades cromossômicas em produtos da concepção. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017; 39(03): 110-114 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1600521 25 Wang Y, Cheng Q, Meng L, Luo C, Hu H, Zhang J, Cheng J, Xu T, Jiang T, Liang D, Hu P, Xu Z. Clinical application of SNP array analysis in first-trimester pregnancy loss: a prospective study. Clin Genet. 2017; 91(6):849-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12926 26 Du Y, Chen L, Lin J, Zhu J, Zhang N, Qiu X, Li D, Wang L. Chromosomal karyotype in chorionic villi of recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. Bioscience Trends, 2018; 12(1):32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01296 27 Marqui ABT. Anormalidades cromossômicas em abortos recorrentes por análise do cariótipo convencional. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infantil. 2018; 18(2): 265-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042018000200002 28 Pylyp LY, Spynenko LO, Verhoglyad NV, Mishenko AO, Mykytenko DO, Zukin VD. Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases. Journal Of Assisted Reproduction And Genetics. 2017; 35(2):265-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1069-1 29 Gug C, Rațiu A, Navolan D, Drăgan I, Groza IM, Păpurică M, Vaida MA, Mozoș I, Jurcă MC. Incidence and Spectrum of Chromosome Abnormalities in Miscarriage Samples: a retrospective study of 330 cases. Cytogenetic And Genome Research. 2019;158(4):171-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000502304 30 Ozawa N, Ogawa K, Sasaki A, Mitsui M, Wada S, Sago H. Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages. Journal Of Assisted Reproduction And Genetics. 2019;36(4):749-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01415-y 31 Waterman CA, Batstone P, Bown N, Cresswell L, Delmege C, English CJ, Fews G, Grimsley L, Imrie S , Kulkarni A, Mann K, Johnson R , Morgan SM, Roberts P, Simonic I, Trueman S, Wall M, McMullan D. The clinical utility of genetic testing of tissues from pregnancy losses. BJOG 2018; 125: 867– 873. 32 MIKWAR, Myy; MACFARLANE, Amanda J.; MARCHETTI, Francesco. Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age. Mutation Research/Reviews In Mutation Research 2020; 785:108320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .mrrev.2020.108320pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4430010412718641pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7556641005277948pt_BR
dc.degree.graduationMedicinapt_BR
dc.degree.levelGraduaçãopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:TCC Medicina

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
TCC-Andrea-Deyse-FINAL.pdf268,83 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.

Ferramentas do administrador